Scoring Methodology

Every product in our database is evaluated across 6 public-facing categories and 8 internal sub-scores. Our scoring is deterministic, transparent, and reproducible.

6-Category Scoring Rubric

CategoryWeight
Nutritional Adequacy & Balance
AAFCO compliance, macronutrient ratios on dry matter basis, digestibility data.
25%
Ingredient Quality
Named protein sources, green/red flag analysis, processing method nutrient retention.
20%
Ingredient Sourcing & Transparency
Named vs unnamed sources, country of origin, third-party certifications.
20%
Scientific & Brand Integrity
Recall history, vet nutritionist involvement, third-party lab testing.
15%
Palatability & Transparency
Palatability testing, packaging accuracy, calorie and nutrient label completeness.
15%
Environmental Responsibility
Sustainable sourcing, eco-friendly packaging, ethical practices.
5%

Score Interpretation

Exceptional
90–100
Very Good
75–89
Good
60–74
Average
40–59
Below Average
0–39

8 Internal Sub-Scores

Nutritional Adequacy25 pts
Ingredient Quality20 pts
Sourcing & Transparency20 pts
Brand Integrity & Safety15 pts
Feeding Trials & Research10 pts
Palatability5 pts
Packaging & Labeling4 pts
Environmental & Ethical1 pts
Total100 pts

Processing Method Scores

MethodNutrient RetentionPathogen Risk
Freeze-Dried5/54/5
Raw Frozen4/54/5
HPP Raw4/51/5
Air-Dried4/53/5
Dehydrated4/52/5
Baked3/52/5
Extruded (Kibble)2/52/5
Canned / Retort2/51/5

Disclaimer

The information provided by the Pet Food Evaluator is for informational and educational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional veterinary advice, diagnosis, or treatment.

Not Veterinary Advice. Always consult your veterinarian or board-certified veterinary nutritionist before making dietary changes.

No Guarantee of Accuracy. Product formulations, ingredient sourcing, and nutritional data may change over time or vary between regions and batches.

No Endorsement. Mention of any specific brands or products does not constitute endorsement or criticism.